Match predicate to give cause or flower girl standing - Petr Krcmar: blog not only on Linux
Other češtinářsky Educational článeček. In line with the predicate give cause is really often makes mistakes. And yet it is so very simple. Compliance baby led weaning with the predicate give cause is perhaps the most common and most obvious offense, which can happen when writing. I see it every day in the comments below articles, often it blasts its editors and learn it all over again the people around you.
What is it? That's what i / s write at the end of predicate - that is seen as verbs / y, heard / y, like / ya like. There are, of course, the exact rules, but you can use it beautiful and simple tool that will set free from all the rules and you simply will always write correctly:
Example: Boys and girls rejoice together. - The boys, the girls, mothers and grandmothers walked. - The mothers, the grandmothers balls and cones from the tree reflected. - The balls, the cones
Well, that's all. If you remember it that way, in most cases you will not have a problem. Although there are extreme situations, but those are few. With them, then you have to decide according to complex rules and see if the life, non-nominative. A few examples:
And I would just wrote "Microsoft and IBM have signed," because these companies are always referred to as TEN Microsoft and IBM TA ... if there was COMPANIES MS and IBM, then I would agree. What do you think? (Sam I am now convinced that I am right :)) 7th 05th 2010 14:00 Petr Krcmar wrote:
No, it is not for the name, company and product complex - previously I wondered why IBM is experienced as feminine, while the Sun, M $ or Linux are masculine ... Make it so or so, my hard y - Microsoft ('s baby led weaning lifeless male) and IBM (female) baby led weaning signed ... 7th 05th 2010, 14:13 Vlastimil Ott wrote: baby led weaning
A distinction is grammatical gender and biological genus, demonstrative pronouns are only donkey bridge and put "extreme situations" baby led weaning are not so marginal. The landing of the UJC no mention of pronouns is not because it's folk and unreliable tool. Horses, boats, parents, what i / y to say? In the first case, it may be both the parents can turn a lot of people 'help' pronoun 'those parents' (I know from experience). It's nonsense, because there are (biological) family baby led weaning and life (and one has to think a little).
Again, I remind my articles where I dealt with it (the link is a kind of overview baby led weaning of the worst mistakes and suggestions for solutions): http://www.e-ott.info/2010/03/09/co-neumite-v-cestine-sklonovat-ja-casovat-v-podminovacim-zpusobu-shodu-podmetu-s-prisudkem-a-dalsi 7th 05th 2010, 14:15 Petr Krcmar wrote:
[4] is methodologically wrong, I admit. But the point is to explain simply and quickly. Nobody will read a long explanation full of incomprehensible expressions. If people read it, then nobody would ever mistake done. But the opposite is true, even though such materials on the Internet ton. This is an educational activity for normal people (read: Czech llamas). baby led weaning 7th 05th 2010 14:20 Vlastimil Ott wrote:
I disagree, it's alibis. :-) O no terms does not, it's curriculum in elementary schools. Instead you should write that everywhere it says hard y, only in the case of male life it is soft. A masculine animate gets priority groups (boys and girls). That's basically it.
[6) This is the target group. What you say is true. But imagine the real person - my sister in law. She has a university education, but is unable to write "I will in a minute." What about her? You tell her "just in case the male's life is soft and masculine animate gets priority groups"? It would not help her at all. For her, it's totally Chinese fairy tale (as the Spanish say).
[9] No just that these people very much. As I wrote, I read it daily discussions and it is horrible. So at least this little endeavor. If it's one person helps a little, so I'm happy. Somewhere in Hospodářkách I recently read that "Trucks went." Horror. baby led weaning 7th 05th 2010 14:50 nmbnmbn wrote:
My father said at reading books (which are mostly correct) and in writing, at remembering how it was in those books. baby led weaning The bad version of me pry must immediately hit the eye. 7th 05th 2010 14:50 Vlastimil Ott wrote:
Češtinářka once we explained earlier vocational / awkwardly and then this one simple tool (with a raised finger and TY, TY, TY, it is only a tool). Unfortunately, even if I just referred to this article, I would feel as a middle Yard bee swarms;) Yesterday, I just landed in the mailbox flyer with tons of bad i / y. 7th 05th 2010 14:55 rastakajakwanna wrote:
Clear that the Utilities are not entirely accurate, but while writing this quickly will help. The majority of such problems is enough really only one, read, read and read. Coz today is sadly out of place. 7th 05th 2010 15:08 MW wrote:
a few of these inconveniences, which not only explain bad, but still people are able to discuss this with you guess: - / robots operators / operator client - particularly done, if it is part of a client-server arch
Other češtinářsky Educational článeček. In line with the predicate give cause is really often makes mistakes. And yet it is so very simple. Compliance baby led weaning with the predicate give cause is perhaps the most common and most obvious offense, which can happen when writing. I see it every day in the comments below articles, often it blasts its editors and learn it all over again the people around you.
What is it? That's what i / s write at the end of predicate - that is seen as verbs / y, heard / y, like / ya like. There are, of course, the exact rules, but you can use it beautiful and simple tool that will set free from all the rules and you simply will always write correctly:
Example: Boys and girls rejoice together. - The boys, the girls, mothers and grandmothers walked. - The mothers, the grandmothers balls and cones from the tree reflected. - The balls, the cones
Well, that's all. If you remember it that way, in most cases you will not have a problem. Although there are extreme situations, but those are few. With them, then you have to decide according to complex rules and see if the life, non-nominative. A few examples:
And I would just wrote "Microsoft and IBM have signed," because these companies are always referred to as TEN Microsoft and IBM TA ... if there was COMPANIES MS and IBM, then I would agree. What do you think? (Sam I am now convinced that I am right :)) 7th 05th 2010 14:00 Petr Krcmar wrote:
No, it is not for the name, company and product complex - previously I wondered why IBM is experienced as feminine, while the Sun, M $ or Linux are masculine ... Make it so or so, my hard y - Microsoft ('s baby led weaning lifeless male) and IBM (female) baby led weaning signed ... 7th 05th 2010, 14:13 Vlastimil Ott wrote: baby led weaning
A distinction is grammatical gender and biological genus, demonstrative pronouns are only donkey bridge and put "extreme situations" baby led weaning are not so marginal. The landing of the UJC no mention of pronouns is not because it's folk and unreliable tool. Horses, boats, parents, what i / y to say? In the first case, it may be both the parents can turn a lot of people 'help' pronoun 'those parents' (I know from experience). It's nonsense, because there are (biological) family baby led weaning and life (and one has to think a little).
Again, I remind my articles where I dealt with it (the link is a kind of overview baby led weaning of the worst mistakes and suggestions for solutions): http://www.e-ott.info/2010/03/09/co-neumite-v-cestine-sklonovat-ja-casovat-v-podminovacim-zpusobu-shodu-podmetu-s-prisudkem-a-dalsi 7th 05th 2010, 14:15 Petr Krcmar wrote:
[4] is methodologically wrong, I admit. But the point is to explain simply and quickly. Nobody will read a long explanation full of incomprehensible expressions. If people read it, then nobody would ever mistake done. But the opposite is true, even though such materials on the Internet ton. This is an educational activity for normal people (read: Czech llamas). baby led weaning 7th 05th 2010 14:20 Vlastimil Ott wrote:
I disagree, it's alibis. :-) O no terms does not, it's curriculum in elementary schools. Instead you should write that everywhere it says hard y, only in the case of male life it is soft. A masculine animate gets priority groups (boys and girls). That's basically it.
[6) This is the target group. What you say is true. But imagine the real person - my sister in law. She has a university education, but is unable to write "I will in a minute." What about her? You tell her "just in case the male's life is soft and masculine animate gets priority groups"? It would not help her at all. For her, it's totally Chinese fairy tale (as the Spanish say).
[9] No just that these people very much. As I wrote, I read it daily discussions and it is horrible. So at least this little endeavor. If it's one person helps a little, so I'm happy. Somewhere in Hospodářkách I recently read that "Trucks went." Horror. baby led weaning 7th 05th 2010 14:50 nmbnmbn wrote:
My father said at reading books (which are mostly correct) and in writing, at remembering how it was in those books. baby led weaning The bad version of me pry must immediately hit the eye. 7th 05th 2010 14:50 Vlastimil Ott wrote:
Češtinářka once we explained earlier vocational / awkwardly and then this one simple tool (with a raised finger and TY, TY, TY, it is only a tool). Unfortunately, even if I just referred to this article, I would feel as a middle Yard bee swarms;) Yesterday, I just landed in the mailbox flyer with tons of bad i / y. 7th 05th 2010 14:55 rastakajakwanna wrote:
Clear that the Utilities are not entirely accurate, but while writing this quickly will help. The majority of such problems is enough really only one, read, read and read. Coz today is sadly out of place. 7th 05th 2010 15:08 MW wrote:
a few of these inconveniences, which not only explain bad, but still people are able to discuss this with you guess: - / robots operators / operator client - particularly done, if it is part of a client-server arch
No comments:
Post a Comment